-
1Event calendar top pick
-
2return to the same spot you were previously editing
-
3customized group home page layout
-
4resize the wiki text editing area
-
5recent pages drop down menu
-
6WYSIWYG Text Editors
-
7OpenID Logon Support
-
8implement email alerts for certain actions
-
9add css for a whole group / committee / wiki-page
-
10Option to kick/ban members
-
11link directly to differences between to versions on dashboard
-
12Public comment capability
-
13Improved Documentation
-
14privacy for public pages
-
15Kick out inactive members from groups
-
16(re)include a "finish until" date for todo list items
-
17Filter group and networks by language and open/closed
-
18Chat on pop-up
-
19Possibility for negative Voting
-
20Log option for chat meetings
-
21Back up group content
-
22To be able to DELETE YOUR ACCOUNT
-
23Searchable user/groups database
-
24recognise email addresses
-
25El problema del idioma
-
26allow non-members to write on public pages
-
27Export Wiki
-
28add Author/uploader in document versioning
-
29Evaluation for surveys
-
30Archive for user documents
-
31User approval tracking
-
32Chat on layers
-
33Send notification with custom messages to emails
-
34Delete private messages
-
35Prioritize personal task list
I can work on allowing users to remove a pg from inbox w/out opening it. |
|
i think changing a forgotten password may be a major new feature, not a minor one, depending on how it works. |
|
there is definitely a bug in the ballot tool. it is not picking the right winner. |
|
yeah, i’m pretty confused about it. i just moved the ‘change tags so that spaces are allowed’ to make it a lower option, and then it became higher ranked. |
|
It is a little confusing that I don’t have to “save” my votes. I’d like to be able to look at other people’s priorities, too, but that might be just because I don’t understand how the vote works and I want to see how others ordered things. Also, unless I’m missing something, I can’t see who’s already voted. Clearly more than Elijah and Jessi, but they’re the only two shown as “contributors” |
|
The votes are saved everytime you move an option around… it may be hard to see because the ‘saving…’ is displayed and then is gone, so if you miss it because it goes too fast you wont realize its being saved. the contributors are just people who have contributed to the comments on the page, now amanda shows up and I will too.. I agree that is a little confusing |
|
sorry, i put a suggestion and this jump to the first place. If it is ok, please let me know if it is understandable for all you. thanks . :) |
|
yeah, the problem is that the method of voting used, condorcet, doesn’t do very well with truncated ballots, meaning ballots where most people have not specified all their preferences. when you add a new option, then everyone has a truncated ballot. although in this particular case, it is very mysterious how it is possible that many people have picked ‘a way to change a forgotten password’ and yet it is still at the bottom. maybe everyone else has ranked that one last, or maybe there is a bug. regarding translation, see multilingual content. i would consider that a major feature. |
|
what about i18n? |
|
I recall seeing elijah saying in a page somewhere that this was something he considered an important major feature (rather than a minor one). I can’t seem to find it on the major features page though. |
|
what about the-next-major-feature? |
|
pietro, if you look at elijah’s comment right above your initial comment about i18n you will see elijah saying:
the problem is… its not listed on the-next-major-feature |
|
multilingual content and i18n are different things, btw. when i said i18n i was talking about the translation of crabgrass ui. when elijah talked about multilingual content he was talking about translation of things written by users. |
|
yeah, maybe elijah was intending to say that the only way the UI could be translated would be if the multilingual problem was solved? In any case, if it is possible to separate the two, it seems to me the most useful step forwards would be to get the ability to translate the UI working, then crabgrass could become useful to more people. btw. I added this to the-next-major-feature vote page, so be sure to vote for it! |
|
i18n is technically already working, it is just that there are no translations yet. the only problem is (a) the UI strings are fairly unstable, and (b) there is now interface for editing them. it should be easy to copy over the interface from nest, but that does not solve problem (a). |
|
i just added “optional e-mail alerts for messages”... but if this has been discussed already and knocked down, you can take it off. I just figure that if it is optional, then security isn’t compromised. And this would keep a lot of users linked into crabgrass (for instance, after the campaign that they originally used crabgrass for has ended) |
|
(is there any way to add to this list? if not…) how about making the diff view a lot nicer (I will tackle this when I am next on my computer, but that might not be for a few weeks). what I mean is do something like wikipedia does – a little context, but just focus in on the changes. right now it is quite cumbersome… |
|
also, damn (separate idea, so separate post) – some quick way to get to the pages you have been editing recently… justing using cg a little bit I am finding myself clicking back to the dashboard just to see the list of recently updated files, and really just wanting to see the ones I’ve participated in recently) |
|
i agree, i requested a “recent pages” section in the drop down me menu. |
|
you can add options under ‘edit my vote’ > ‘add new possibility’ |
|
next minor feature request – put add new possibility somewhere more intuitive. :) |
|
I don’t find ‘recent pages drop down menu’ self-explanatory, and I’m not sure what that means. |
|
I think maybe they mean just a history of pages you have participated in. In the very first sketches that dan and I made we had something like this. I think that the people and groups menus should also work like this: the groups/people you have recently done something with are the ones that are listed, but you can hit a continuation link to see the full list. |
|
is OpenID likened to google’s open social? |
|
It’s similar in that it’s an open standard. But OpenID really has little to do with social networking. OpenID allows a single sign-on to any service that supports it, with multiple customizable levels of privacy and identities (so that the user may share different types of data with individuals or groups of folks). |
|
I like the sounds of it. So, basically crabgrass would need to sign on with it? |
|
for public pages (i can put this as an example i guess…), we.riseup.net/users/anas_useful_links which are visible even for people without an account, would less confusing if for viewers not logged in the links that are not going to work (i.e. the entire menu on the right) were not visible. I think this would apply for all pages that are viewed while you are not signed on … better to not see the links than to click on one only to receive a “you are not authorised to see this page” (a waste of bandwidth for the user…) hope this is a minor change :) ana |
|
ana: two things:
|
|
I wanted to register my dislike of openID, I think that there are significant problems with it making me think that the supposed convenience it offers doesn’t outweigh these issues. I’d like it if there was a good discussion of these problems before it was implemented and accepted. We need to make conscious decisions to take a steps that could be problematic. |
|
Yeah Micah, some of that definitely sounds scary … I wasn’t aware of these issues with OpenID when I suggested it as a feature request. |
|